<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Think Gene - Latest Comments in Clues to ancestral origin of placenta emerge in Stanford study</title><link>http://thinkgene.disqus.com/</link><description>a bio blog about genetics, genomics, and biotechnology</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:47:19 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Clues to ancestral origin of placenta emerge in Stanford study</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/clues-to-ancestral-origin-of-placenta-emerge-in-stanford-study/#comment-2463785</link><description>Yes, that is correct. The placenta is from the fetus. However, since it integrates with the mother and also becomes part of her body, I would say that it's just as much the mother's organ as it is the fetus's; it just has the genotype of the fetus. I'm not an expert in this field, so I don't know if other scientists actually consider it to be the mother's organ.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh Hill</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:47:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clues to ancestral origin of placenta emerge in Stanford study</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/clues-to-ancestral-origin-of-placenta-emerge-in-stanford-study/#comment-2463784</link><description>"It is the only organ to develop in adulthood" - but it's an organ of the fetus, no?  it's genetically the fetus's.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;i assumed with multiple placental mammal births that each fetus had its own placenta.  is that not true?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rosemary</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:38:24 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>