<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Think Gene - Latest Comments in Prevailing theory of aging challenged in Stanford worm study</title><link>http://thinkgene.disqus.com/</link><description>a bio blog about genetics, genomics, and biotechnology</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:21:21 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Prevailing theory of aging challenged in Stanford worm study</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/prevailing-theory-of-aging-challenged-in-stanford-worm-study/#comment-16548202</link><description>keep researching, ensure your systems are working fine,,, i recommend using geeks mobile usa service for computer repair and maintenance, every problem solved onsite as well as through remote assistance. &lt;a href="http://www.computerrepairservicesusa.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.computerrepairservicesusa.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">smith</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:21:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Prevailing theory of aging challenged in Stanford worm study</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/prevailing-theory-of-aging-challenged-in-stanford-worm-study/#comment-9357780</link><description>Rid of those pesky bugs you pick when surfing the net.&lt;br&gt;One of the first things that I learned when I got my new computer was that if you own a PC then you better have a good antispyware scanner to help get rid of those pesky bugs you pick when surfing the net. Otherwise, your computer won’t keep running like new for very long. It will begin to slow down and eventually get so sluggish you won’t even be able to use it. I tried a variety of different scans before I ran across Search-and-destroy Antispyware at &lt;a href="http://www.Search-and-destroy.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.Search-and-destroy.com&lt;/a&gt;. So far I have been very happy with the antispyware solution from Search-and-destroy and very glad that I gave it a try.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rickymartin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 06:45:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Prevailing theory of aging challenged in Stanford worm study</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/prevailing-theory-of-aging-challenged-in-stanford-worm-study/#comment-2464651</link><description>Live fast, die young.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vedetta</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 22:30:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Prevailing theory of aging challenged in Stanford worm study</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/prevailing-theory-of-aging-challenged-in-stanford-worm-study/#comment-2464649</link><description>I learned the gist of this article 15 years ago and have been beating the "free radical" people over the head with the idea for years. This isn't new information.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jaesrynn</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:40:12 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>