<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Think Gene - Latest Comments in Prevailing theory of aging challenged in Stanford worm study</title><link>http://thinkgene.disqus.com/</link><description>a bio blog about genetics, genomics, and biotechnology</description><atom:link href="https://thinkgene.disqus.com/prevailing_theory_of_aging_challenged_in_stanford_worm_study/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 15:16:49 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Prevailing theory of aging challenged in Stanford worm study</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/prevailing-theory-of-aging-challenged-in-stanford-worm-study/#comment-32631735</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thus, the cells can only divide a fixed number of times before the telomeres disappear and DNA damage occurs. In almost all cancer cells, telomerase has been re-activated, allowing the cells to divide indefinitely.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Privatlaan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 15:16:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Prevailing theory of aging challenged in Stanford worm study</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/prevailing-theory-of-aging-challenged-in-stanford-worm-study/#comment-31542904</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Kim’s lab examined the regulation of aging in C. elegans, a millimeter-long nematode worm whose simple body and small number of genes make it a useful tool for biologists. The worms age rapidly: their maximum life span is about two weeks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Botox</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:08:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Prevailing theory of aging challenged in Stanford worm study</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/prevailing-theory-of-aging-challenged-in-stanford-worm-study/#comment-31054452</link><description>&lt;p&gt;These shifts trigger genetic pathways that transform young worms into geezers. The findings will appear in the July 24 issue of the journal Cell.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">WonderKing Hacks</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 07:57:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Prevailing theory of aging challenged in Stanford worm study</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/prevailing-theory-of-aging-challenged-in-stanford-worm-study/#comment-30879580</link><description>&lt;p&gt;However, natural selection works by favoring genes that help organisms produce lots of offspring. After reproduction ends, genes are beyond natural selection’s reach, so scientists argued that aging couldn’t be genetically programmed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Free Online Games</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:52:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Prevailing theory of aging challenged in Stanford worm study</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/prevailing-theory-of-aging-challenged-in-stanford-worm-study/#comment-29633241</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Comparing young worms to old worms, Kim’s team discovered age-related shifts in levels of three transcription factors, the molecular switches that turn genes on and off. These shifts trigger genetic pathways that transform young worms into geezers. The findings will appear in the July 24 issue of the journal Cell.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Finpecia</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:44:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Prevailing theory of aging challenged in Stanford worm study</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/prevailing-theory-of-aging-challenged-in-stanford-worm-study/#comment-29607423</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As there are 4 bases. The base id could be represented in a 2-bit field for each base in a sequence. So, for storing, A G C T could be stored as 00 01 10 11 respectively and then retrieved and converted to human readable A G C T.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chrome Hearts</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 03:18:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Prevailing theory of aging challenged in Stanford worm study</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/prevailing-theory-of-aging-challenged-in-stanford-worm-study/#comment-16548202</link><description>&lt;p&gt;keep researching, ensure your systems are working fine,,, i recommend using geeks mobile usa service for computer repair and maintenance, every problem solved onsite as well as through remote assistance. &lt;a href="http://www.computerrepairservicesusa.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.computerrepairservicesusa.com"&gt;www.computerrepairservicesu...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">smith</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:21:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Prevailing theory of aging challenged in Stanford worm study</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/prevailing-theory-of-aging-challenged-in-stanford-worm-study/#comment-9357780</link><description>&lt;p&gt; Rid of those pesky bugs you pick when surfing the net.&lt;br&gt;One of the first things that I learned when I got my new computer was that if you own a PC then you better have a good antispyware scanner to help get rid of those pesky bugs you pick when surfing the net. Otherwise, your computer won’t keep running like new for very long. It will begin to slow down and eventually get so sluggish you won’t even be able to use it. I tried a variety of different scans before I ran across Search-and-destroy Antispyware at &lt;a href="http://www.Search-and-destroy.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.Search-and-destroy.com"&gt;http://www.Search-and-destr...&lt;/a&gt;. So far I have been very happy with the antispyware solution from Search-and-destroy and very glad that I gave it a try. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rickymartin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 06:45:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Prevailing theory of aging challenged in Stanford worm study</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/prevailing-theory-of-aging-challenged-in-stanford-worm-study/#comment-2464651</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Live fast, die young.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vedetta</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 22:30:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Prevailing theory of aging challenged in Stanford worm study</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/prevailing-theory-of-aging-challenged-in-stanford-worm-study/#comment-2464649</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I learned the gist of this article 15 years ago and have been beating the "free radical" people over the head with the idea for years. This isn't new information.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jaesrynn</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:40:12 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>