<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Think Gene - Latest Comments in Shortest Response: Why do scientific theories work?</title><link>http://thinkgene.disqus.com/</link><description>a bio blog about genetics, genomics, and biotechnology</description><atom:link href="https://thinkgene.disqus.com/shortest_response_why_do_scientific_theories_work/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:21:53 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Shortest Response: Why do scientific theories work?</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/shortest-response-why-do-scientific-theories-work/#comment-2464424</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's because they work mostly; that is good enough for most of us.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I got that little ditty from studying the uncertainity principle in a modern physics class.  This taught me that statistics is important in the interpretation of nature.&lt;br&gt;And so...there you have it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John C</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:21:53 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>