<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Think Gene - Latest Comments in Should scientists study race and IQ?</title><link>http://thinkgene.disqus.com/</link><description>a bio blog about genetics, genomics, and biotechnology</description><atom:link href="https://thinkgene.disqus.com/should_scientists_study_race_and_iq/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 12:27:14 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Should scientists study race and IQ?</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/should-scientists-study-race-and-iq/#comment-34114466</link><description>&lt;p&gt;One section deals with Cotten's life after the death from leukemia of his wife Lenore. Quote: "Once home, I discovered that I did have friends.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Army Surplus</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 12:27:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should scientists study race and IQ?</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/should-scientists-study-race-and-iq/#comment-33376372</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is also why, unlike the trend of IPOs after the dotcom bust, the trend of corporations acquiring startups may slow down significantly, but will not stop completely.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">holiday to Puerto del Carmen</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 06:19:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should scientists study race and IQ?</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/should-scientists-study-race-and-iq/#comment-33354456</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Many thanks for this very useful tip&lt;br&gt;It worked like magic!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hurghada holidays</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:51:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should scientists study race and IQ?</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/should-scientists-study-race-and-iq/#comment-32454262</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Alas, my only super-power is the ability to generate piles of unnecessary verbiage...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fethiye, Dalaman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:55:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should scientists study race and IQ?</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/should-scientists-study-race-and-iq/#comment-31774394</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So I’ll briefly outline the two arguments and explain why I think Ceci and Williams make a stronger case—and why I suspect that Rose means more than he says.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Youtube mp3</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 03:31:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should scientists study race and IQ?</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/should-scientists-study-race-and-iq/#comment-31505485</link><description>&lt;p&gt;the brain is an organ like all other organs in the human body&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">weeds season 5</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 06:32:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should scientists study race and IQ?</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/should-scientists-study-race-and-iq/#comment-31404943</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So I’ll briefly outline the two arguments and explain why I think Ceci and Williams make a stronger case—and why I suspect that Rose means more than he says.&lt;a href="http://www.Greatcanvasart.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.Greatcanvasart.com"&gt;Canvas Art&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pamelazz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:21:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should scientists study race and IQ?</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/should-scientists-study-race-and-iq/#comment-30090346</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thus while Rose makes some fair points about the difficulties of defining both race and intelligence, I find his overall argument less than compelling.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tower defense</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 11:28:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should scientists study race and IQ?</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/should-scientists-study-race-and-iq/#comment-28894677</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If you believe otherwise, again, I’m sure that you could write a well-composed theme for your preferred institution of higher education about the equality of diversity, and everyone there will be duly impressed, though whatever criteria by which your theme is judged will shift to other matters including grammar and the imagined color and size of your nipples.&lt;br&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.bestdriverupdater.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.bestdriverupdater.com"&gt;driver updater&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tress</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 09:40:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should scientists study race and IQ?</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/should-scientists-study-race-and-iq/#comment-28758295</link><description>&lt;p&gt;the brain is an organ like all other organs in the human body. It would be a fantastic coincidence if its operation were statistically independent from haplotype —particularly since it’s not.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tower defense games</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 02:56:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should scientists study race and IQ?</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/should-scientists-study-race-and-iq/#comment-27240031</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I find it pretty hard to stomach the notion that any field of scientific enquiry should be completely off the table, even an area as contentious and politically charged as this one - in fact especially in such an area, since nowhere are solid facts needed as desperately as in a debate driven largely by ideals and emotions. Thus while Rose makes some fair points about the difficulties of defining both race and intelligence, I find his overall argument less than compelling.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">watch friends</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 01:38:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should scientists study race and IQ?</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/should-scientists-study-race-and-iq/#comment-25447873</link><description>&lt;p&gt;don’t know how this would be possible, but personally, I’d bet my intermediate medical and financial future on the pharmacogenomics of psychoactive prescription medications.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">korean fashion</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:16:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should scientists study race and IQ?</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/should-scientists-study-race-and-iq/#comment-24891446</link><description>&lt;p&gt;yes, it is a very rich field of research indeed!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cash for gold</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 05:30:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should scientists study race and IQ?</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/should-scientists-study-race-and-iq/#comment-24683084</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So I’ll briefly outline the two arguments and explain why I think Ceci and Williams make a stronger case—and why I suspect that Rose means more than he says.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barcelona cheap booking</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 08:37:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should scientists study race and IQ?</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/should-scientists-study-race-and-iq/#comment-23876313</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The idea that is being spruiked here is that genetic testing can help you determine your child's "&lt;a href="http://www.phallosan.ro/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.phallosan.ro/"&gt;marirea penisului&lt;/a&gt;", which you can then use to ruthlessly jam them into whatever career the test results suggest.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">corimica</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:37:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should scientists study race and IQ?</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/should-scientists-study-race-and-iq/#comment-6416005</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lol, yes. Yes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Yates</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:01:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should scientists study race and IQ?</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/should-scientists-study-race-and-iq/#comment-6406823</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If I'm a genomic blogging superhero, am I now duty-bound to foil the evil plot of &lt;a href="http://www.thinkgene.com/oh-dr-gene-sherpa/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.thinkgene.com/oh-dr-gene-sherpa/"&gt;the genomic blogging super-villain&lt;/a&gt;? Does that make you the Evil Sherpa's vile henchman?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Alas, my only super-power is the ability to generate piles of unnecessary verbiage...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel MacArthur</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:56:27 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>