<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Think Gene - Latest Comments in The American Gene Patent Legal FAQ</title><link>http://thinkgene.disqus.com/</link><description>a bio blog about genetics, genomics, and biotechnology</description><atom:link href="https://thinkgene.disqus.com/the_american_gene_patent_legal_faq/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:11:34 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The American Gene Patent Legal FAQ</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/the-american-gene-patent-legal-faq/#comment-34725590</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If a patent application discloses only nucleic acid molecular structure for a newly discovered gene, and no utility for the claimed isolated gene, the claimed invention is not patentable.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Life in Ireland </dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:11:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The American Gene Patent Legal FAQ</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/the-american-gene-patent-legal-faq/#comment-34168038</link><description>&lt;p&gt;However, forget for a moment that genes are “information.” Think of DNA as a chemical that can be extracted from a human cell!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Seguro Automoviles</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 01:45:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The American Gene Patent Legal FAQ</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/the-american-gene-patent-legal-faq/#comment-34117003</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Adafruit has 3 Tweet-A-Watts in their offices - each hooked up to a different set of electronics. As you can see from the screenshot below, some appliances (like the computers) are always on while some (like the lab equipment/tools) are periodically used.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Army Surplus</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 13:12:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The American Gene Patent Legal FAQ</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/the-american-gene-patent-legal-faq/#comment-34103788</link><description>&lt;p&gt;However, this is the current understanding of the law until judicial rulings or legislation declare otherwise.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kansas Jayhawks Fan Gear</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 10:08:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The American Gene Patent Legal FAQ</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/the-american-gene-patent-legal-faq/#comment-33376578</link><description>&lt;p&gt;CSS is designed primarily to enable the separation of document content (written in HTML or a similar markup language) from document presentation, including elements such as the colors, fonts, and layout. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tenerife holidays</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 06:27:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The American Gene Patent Legal FAQ</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/the-american-gene-patent-legal-faq/#comment-33282229</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Abstract ideas, mathematical formulas, and products of nature are all specifically excluded as patentable subjects by judicial rulings. However, forget for a moment that genes are “information.” Think of DNA as a chemical that can be extracted from a human cell&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Djarum Black</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 13:03:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The American Gene Patent Legal FAQ</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/the-american-gene-patent-legal-faq/#comment-32632001</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That processing method and its products constitute patentable subject matter.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Privatlaan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 15:19:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The American Gene Patent Legal FAQ</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/the-american-gene-patent-legal-faq/#comment-32454594</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bradley I apologise for sending you two friend requests. And you make a very good point on rude online behaviour. I am guilty as charged and make no excuses because what I did is wrong.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Belek holiday</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 01:02:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The American Gene Patent Legal FAQ</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/the-american-gene-patent-legal-faq/#comment-31909532</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I had a similar experience about four years ago as well. An email on the screen and a nice chat about a service provider having done something horribly wrong.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Youtube to mp3</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:42:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The American Gene Patent Legal FAQ</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/the-american-gene-patent-legal-faq/#comment-31548443</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In addressing future needs of companies for a greater diversity in quality and size of physical innovation infrastructure, private high-tech facility developers and managers should be consulted, at an increased level of current involvement, and potentially attracted to develop and operate space.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lyrics</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:59:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The American Gene Patent Legal FAQ</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/the-american-gene-patent-legal-faq/#comment-31056394</link><description>&lt;p&gt;While Judge Learned Hand held that while adrenaline itself was a product of nature, the purified adrenaline was something new and thus a patentable subject matter.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gunz Hacks</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 09:07:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The American Gene Patent Legal FAQ</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/the-american-gene-patent-legal-faq/#comment-31028508</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your hard work! I look forward to playing with the rewritten code.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">online fax</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 01:05:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The American Gene Patent Legal FAQ</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/the-american-gene-patent-legal-faq/#comment-30897233</link><description>&lt;p&gt;eventually the genes are going to be 100% mapped, it's just a matter of time and how open the world is going to be about this subject.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bejeweled</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 14:03:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The American Gene Patent Legal FAQ</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/the-american-gene-patent-legal-faq/#comment-30897111</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think it's every mans right to decide his own opinion on this subject.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bike games</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 14:01:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The American Gene Patent Legal FAQ</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/the-american-gene-patent-legal-faq/#comment-30880857</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The precedent for these biochemical patents is Parke-Davis &amp;amp; Co. v H.K. Mulford &amp;amp; Co. At issue was a patent for purified animal adrenaline.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Free Online Games</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 11:07:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The American Gene Patent Legal FAQ</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/the-american-gene-patent-legal-faq/#comment-30163358</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The requirement that a chemical process be useful is not satisfied by a showing that the compound yielded belongs to a class of compounds which scientists are screening for possible uses.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tower defense</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 23:04:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The American Gene Patent Legal FAQ</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/the-american-gene-patent-legal-faq/#comment-29664577</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In practice, scientists do not simply “observe” the “abstract ideas” of DNA “in nature” with something like a microscope. DNA must first be “processed” for humans to learn anything about it. That processing method and its products constitute patentable subject matter.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Buy Cheap Finpecia </dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:19:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The American Gene Patent Legal FAQ</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/the-american-gene-patent-legal-faq/#comment-29545053</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That is, where the application discloses a specific, substantial, and credible utility for the claimed isolated and purified gene, the isolated and purified gene composition may be patentable.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Escape games</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:02:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The American Gene Patent Legal FAQ</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/the-american-gene-patent-legal-faq/#comment-28895291</link><description>&lt;p&gt;While Judge Learned Hand held that while adrenaline itself was a product of nature, the purified adrenaline was something new and thus a patentable subject matter.&lt;br&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.identitytheftprotectionservice.net" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.identitytheftprotectionservice.net"&gt;identity theft protection service&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tress</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 09:49:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The American Gene Patent Legal FAQ</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/the-american-gene-patent-legal-faq/#comment-28701259</link><description>&lt;p&gt;an inventor’s discovery of a gene can be the basis for a patent on the genetic composition isolated from its natural state and processed through purifying steps that separate the gene from other molecules naturally associated with it&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tower defense games</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 14:20:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The American Gene Patent Legal FAQ</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/the-american-gene-patent-legal-faq/#comment-25285773</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The requirement that a chemical process be useful is not satisfied by a showing that the compound yielded belongs to a class of compounds which scientists are screening for possible uses.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">online games</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:19:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The American Gene Patent Legal FAQ</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/the-american-gene-patent-legal-faq/#comment-23524425</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thus, an inventor’s discovery of a gene can be the basis for a patent on the genetic composition isolated from its natural state and processed through purifying steps that separate the gene from other molecules naturally associated with it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">casting calls</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 06:14:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The American Gene Patent Legal FAQ</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/the-american-gene-patent-legal-faq/#comment-21932867</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The precedent for these biochemical patents is Parke-Davis &amp;amp; Co. v H.K. Mulford &amp;amp; Co. At issue was a patent for purified animal adrenaline&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheap Leaflet Printing</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 07:23:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The American Gene Patent Legal FAQ</title><link>http://www.thinkgene.com/the-american-gene-patent-legal-faq/#comment-19542783</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It is merely the right to exclude others from making, using, importing, selling, and offering for sale the patented matter.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Managed Hosting</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 09:00:55 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>